Since 1990, 2.6 billion people have gained access to an “improved” drinking water source, one that is designed to protect against contamination. It considers gaps in the data and what we still need to know to achieve universal access.ġ | Billions of people have gained access to water, but huge inequalities remain It also examines how the current situation matches up to the vision for universal and equitable access to safe and affordable drinking water – set out by the sustainable development goals (SDGs). Will you help Next City fulfill its mission? Yes! I want to donate.How many people have access to clean and safe water? Where do they get it from, and how much do they pay for it? A new report by the World Health Organisation/Unicef Joint Monitoring Programme delves into data on drinking water from the last 17 years to give a detailed view of the state of access to drinking water today.
Today we’re sharing a new strategic plan that boldly affirms our commitment to the diverse changemakers, like you, who are working to liberate our cities from oppression and to the high-quality solutions journalism essential for informing that work. Our team at Next City - board and staff - have spent the last several months thinking about that future and articulating our role in helping to shape it. Instead - especially as community changemakers - we should chart a course for a future that is equitable, just, and humane. It’s not a return to normal that we should desire or work toward. A return to that normality means embracing deep inequity and injustice as tolerable features of city life and city-building practice. But the normal in The Before Times wasn’t so great for far too many people and communities. You’ve probably heard that more than a few times as we continue navigating life in an evolving pandemic. In the new world of water, that will have to change.Ī message from board member Lynn. has played fast and loose with its water supply. Water strategies such as those developed in Singapore will likely become increasingly relevant for nations such as the United States. It also has been shrewd in its negotiation of international agreements, importing 40 percent of its water supply from Malaysia. Singapore has no freshwater lakes or aquifers and received the highest ranking for water stress, yet it is a leader in water management because of its forward-thinking practices in rainwater collection, desalination, recycled water and conservation. Both nations face “high” risk levels in their agricultural sectors.Īs the WRI researchers point out, a nation facing severe natural constraints on its water supply can still find solutions.
India, Mexico, South Africa, Chile and Australia are all ranked as “high stress.” The United States and China fall into the “medium to high stress” category at numbers 70 and 72, respectively. Many Caribbean countries and several on the Arabian Peninsula make the list, along with Iran, Morocco, Mongolia and Afghanistan.īut other countries, many with large populations, find themselves in trouble due to a combination of supply and demand issues. Most of the nations among the 37 most-stressed are located on islands or in deserts, and so face significant geographical challenges. The data came from WRI’s Aqueduct Water Risk Analysis. The researchers looked at not only baseline water stress - that’s the ratio of annual water withdrawals to renewable supply - but also at the yearly and seasonal variation in water supply, the number of floods between 19, and the severity of drought between 19. “Such situations severely threaten national water security and economic growth - especially if a country does not have adequate water-management plans in place,” wrote WRI’s Paul Reig, Andrew Maddocks and Francis Gassert in a blog post announcing the findings. What does that mean, exactly? According to the data, the highest-stress nations - shown in red on the map - use more than 80 percent of their available water each year. Many more, together containing at least one-third of the world’s population, fall into the “high” or “medium to high” categories. Out of 181 nations included in the rankings, 37 face what WRI calls “extremely high” levels of water stress. Infrastructure Bill Needs Fixing, Critics Say.
#How many water may i take with global entry login how to#
How to Bring Radical Truth & Joy to City-Building.At “Shark Tank for Cities,” Civil Servants Learn to Speak Investors’ Language.
0 kommentar(er)
